GoldmanSachs666 Message Board

Fraud*
According to the Collins English Dictionary 10th Edition fraud can be defined as: "deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage".[1] In the broadest sense, a fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and also a civil law violation. Defrauding people or entities of money or valuables is a common purpose of fraud, but there have also been fraudulent "discoveries", e.g. in science, to gain prestige rather than immediate monetary gain
*As defined in Wikipedia

Friday, December 7, 2012

The Injustice of Justice...Judge Does Not Care About Fraud

As promised, here is an update from Laser Haas in his diligent fight for justice.  Unfortunately for him AND for ALL OF US, our judicial system as with all branches of our government does not want to take any action against those, too big to fail or those in the 1% with the money to buy lobbyists and influence government, who seem to rule our country. 

Yes, while they appear to act as good ordinary law abiding citizens - they in cause and effect -  have all the  power over our land, laws and constitution.  And as the not so Supreme Court ruled, our corporations must be afforded the same rights and privileges as each of us individually.  But in fact, as you can see, they are given privilege above and beyond what each of us have.  "WE THE PEOPLE" has become "WE, THE CORPORATIONS - AGAINST THE PEOPLE"

AMERICA...BEWARE.  AMERICA...WAKE UP! Taking away the "equity" from our judicial system erases the last ray of hope any of us will ever have.

Here now a reprint of the latest communication from Laser Haas:

Nineteen (19) entities/ persons promised to be online during the court hearing on December 4, 2012. Because no one was able to complete the task (for various reasons); I stood alone against Mitt Romney/ Bain Capital & Goldman Sachs.

It was easy for the court - to abuse due process - and quash the evidence.

It will be 45 days, before we can get the transcript of the December 4, 2012 hearing in the eToys case.

Judge said that our production of new evidence of Bain Capital fraud is of NO value. That no one (especially this victim/ witness) - is permitted to submit the evidence of crimes in the eToys federal case. Her Honor said it is vexatious (to point out Bain Capital frauds) and is also harrassment.

However - her Honor said the claims/ evidences are without merit - and that is Clear Error.

Succinctly, the Judge (MFW) said she doesn't care about Bain Capital 10 year old fraud. That no one - other than people she gives her blessing to - are allowed to inform her of fraud upon the court. She says it doesn't matter that I worked under her court approval. Only the attorneys in the case (http://www.mnat.com/ and Paul Traub) are allowed to inform her of frauds transpiring there.

What is absurd is the fact that both MNAT and Paul Traub have CONFESSED to lying under oath to her 34 times already. They also admitted it was "deliberate" (and the U.S. Trustee testified he "forewarned" the parties not to do the very statutory violations they went ahead and did in secret. (see parts 19 & 35 of U.S. Trustee Motion to Disgorge Traub, Bonacquist & Fox http://petters-fraud.com/DisgorgeMotion_TBF_1_6_Million.pdf )

The judge has Ordered that I am permanently barred from submitting pleadings in the case.

It is time to poke the bear - and I hope when they turn around to quash me - you will remember I stood firm.

Sincerely
Laser Haas
Justice is due diligence
Here is the best statement made by Her less then Honor:
Judge said that our production of new evidence of Bain Capital fraud is of NO value. That no one (especially this victim/ witness) - is permitted to submit the evidence of crimes in the eToys federal case. Her Honor said it is vexatious (to point out Bain Capital frauds) and is also harrassment.
HARRASSMENT!!!!????? Can you believe that a Federal Judge would consider exposing Bain Capital Fraud in "our" court of law is harrassment?  Just when I think maybe, just maybe, our country might be going back in the right direction of freedom and democracy here comes a big bump in the road...exposing fraud is harrassment.  In other words, setting precedence that anyone attempting to expose fraud in our courts of law cannot due so.  In fact, and I am not a lawyer, but I would think if the court deems this to be harassment it then opens the door for the alleged fraudster to sue the person/entity attempting to do the right thing.

A very bad precedent to be set - especially in a Federal Court.  This is just one more nail in the legal coffin against "the people" taking away our freedoms, pursuit of happiness and especially the pursuit of justice.  All the things that once made this great land of ours so great.

And YES, Laser, you DID stand firm but the deck was and is stacked against us all.  If this were a Marvel cartoon story and you were a caped crusader (which in my eyes you are), you in the end would prevail proving justice for all Americans.

Zap, Whoosh, Tingle, Craaack....where is Judge Dredd?

2 COMMENTS:

Joyce R said...

Corruption has also affected the justice system but it is bound to become worse because bad judges will eventually push out the good ones unless the whole system is restructured.

LiberatedCit said...

The president doesn't care about fraud either

Five Senior Goldman Sachs Execs Gave $130K To 'Obama Victory Fund' WHILE Eric Holder Was Deciding Whether To File Criminal Charges
http://dailybail.com/home/convicted-bush-1300-clinton-1000-obama-00.html

SPECIAL REPORT: Inside The Department Of Justice’s Unprecedented Failure To Prosecute Big Finance
http://dailybail.com/home/special-report-inside-the-department-of-justices-unprecedent.html

Report: Cronyism, political donations likely behind Obama, Holder failure to charge any bankers after 2008 financial meltdown

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/07/report-cronyism-political-donations-likely-behind-obama-holder-failure-to-charge-any-bankers-after-2008-financial-meltdown/?print=1

There is a story about this years Inauguration but it is incorrect banks are corporations


Obama Banned Corporate Donations for Inauguration in 2009, Allows Them in 2013http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-banned-corporate-donations-inauguration-2009-allows-them-2013_665164.html


WASHINGTON — President Obama’s finance team is offering corporations and other institutions that contribute $1 million exclusive access to an array of inaugural festivities, including tickets to a “benefactors reception,” a children’s concert, a candlelight celebration at the National Building Museum, two reserved parade bleacher seats and four tickets to the president’s official inaugural ball.

more
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/us/politics/obama-team-outlines-four-corporate-donor-packages-for-inauguration.html

Flashback
Bailed-Out Banks Donate to Obama Inauguration

http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/bailed-out-banks-donate-to-obama-inauguration?news=838305

Post a Comment