Note from Larry: July 18, 2010 Need Donations For Email Client We are looking for a donation to subscribe to an email client such as Constant Contact or equivalent so that we can re0establish our daily email notifications of our daily posts.
This service was well received in the past and does help expand our readership as well. If you would like to donate, you can either donate the dollars or the subscription to a service. PLEASE HELP. Thank you.
Please contact Larry at Larry@GoldmanSachs666.com if you can help.
We do have a large opt in list that once did receive our emails.
Media Inquiries: media @GoldmanSachs666.com General Info: info@GS666.org Volunteer Info: volunteer@GoldmanSachs666.com _____________________________________________________ When cheaters prosper, we end up with the worst possible system and to call it a free market system is an obscenity. -William Black ________________________________________________
Goldman Sachs sent $4.3 billion in federal tax money to 32 entities, including many overseas banks, hedge funds and pensions, according to information made public Friday night.
Goldman Sachs disclosed the list of companies to the Senate Finance Committee after a threat of subpoena from Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Ia.
Asked the significance of the list, Grassley said, "I hope it's as simple as taxpayers deserve to know what happened to their money."
He added, "We thought originally we were bailing out AIG. Then later on ... we learned that the money flowed through AIG to a few big banks, and now we know that the money went from these few big banks to dozens of financial institutions all around the world."
That is a very good question. In my previous post - The War On Wall Street", July 21, 2010, I made some pretty harsh statements about the nature of Goldman Sachs and its' affect on our nations as well as the people of nations around the world.
I have often maintained that any action by any company, individual or group of individuals, that has a mass negative affect on the people should be considered an enemy of the state. In fact, some actions taken by these individuals may even be considered treasonous. I believe that some high ranking government officials have commited treason but their actions, by virtue of who they are, are not dealt with as they would if it were you or I doing the same things.
So to is it with our TBTF (too big to fail) mega corporations. They too can commit crimes that greatly and negatively impact the population, yet, by virtue of who they are (how much money they have and control) little is said or done.
Recently Richard Eskow wrote an article in the Huffington Post -Wall Street "Justice": AIG Evidence Raises the Question, "Where Are the Indictments?"- wherein he also questions the lack of any criminal prosecutions in the face of very obvious criminal activity. By the way, Richard also mentions this site and quotes a statistic I gave in another of my posts. Thanks Richard, I am happy to see that you follow us.
We know we are fighting an "enemy" of terrorists who have attached us, our way of life and threaten our very existence. We call the biggest of these terror groups Al Quida but know that that are other factions and groups with the same goals against us as theirs.
But does an enemy of the state have to bear arms against us to be a danger to us? No, they do not. Those who would cause financial ruin to people, states, a nations and the world can and should be considered our "enemies". The banking cartel led by Goldman Sachs should fall into this category. They should be treated as enemies, held accountable for their crimes, be detained, tried in a court of law and sentenced to appropriate punishments if found guilty by a jury of their peers (that would be you and I not their fellow CEO's).
Miriam Webster's On Line Dictionary defines Enemy as:
Main Entry: en·e·my
Pronunciation: \ˈe-nə-mē\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): pluralen·e·mies
Etymology: Middle English enemi, from Anglo-French, from Latin inimicus, from in-1in- + amicus friend — more at amiable
Date: 13th century
1:one that is antagonistic to another; especially: one seeking to injure, overthrow, or confound an opponent 2:something harmful or deadly 3 a: a military adversary b: a hostile unit or force
Etymology: Middle English tresoun, from Anglo-French traisun, from Latin tradition-, traditio act of handing over, from tradere to hand over, betray — more at traitor
Date: 13th century
1: the betrayal of a trust: treachery 2: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
