GoldmanSachs666 Message Board

According to the Collins English Dictionary 10th Edition fraud can be defined as: "deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage".[1] In the broadest sense, a fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and also a civil law violation. Defrauding people or entities of money or valuables is a common purpose of fraud, but there have also been fraudulent "discoveries", e.g. in science, to gain prestige rather than immediate monetary gain
*As defined in Wikipedia

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Of Course, Goldman Sachs Facilitates Privatization. That's What Oligopoly is For!

The next stage of the debt financial crisis appears to be underway in the UK where austerity has been introduced by the government who think they are in dire need of paying off the federal debt caused by the bailout of banks in 2008 for their fraudulent lending and market activities.  Privatization is being undertaken for the sake of creating "efficiencies" that the private sector has supposedly perfected but which will really mean the likelihood of unemployed public workers, the eliminations of unions and the creation of more wealth inequality.

So the government in Britain has asked the banks, including Goldman Sachs, to facilitate the prizatization of the Royal Mail.  Apparently the banks involved gave the government a reduced fee rate in anticipation of further privatization of public properties.

Privatizing  public services can mean that the public is no longer well served and prices may increase in order for profit to be achieved.    As Michael Hudson says:
'Politics is being financialized while economies are being privatized. The financial strategy was to remove economic planning from democratically elected representatives, centralizing it in the hands of financial managers. What Benito Mussolini called “corporatism” in the 1920s (to give it its polite name) is now being achieved by Europe’s large banks and financial institutions – ironically (but I suppose inevitably) under the euphemism of “free market economics.”

'Language is adopting itself to reflect the economic and political transformation (surrender?) now underway. Central bank “independence” was euphemized as the “hallmark of democracy,” not the victory of financial oligarchy. The task of rhetoric is to divert attention from the fact that the financial sector aims not to “free” markets, but to place control in the hands of financial managers – whose logic is to subject economies to austerity and even depression, sell off public land and enterprises, suffer emigration and reduce living standards in the face of a sharply increasing concentration of wealth at the top of the economic pyramid. The idea is to slash government employment, lowering public-sector salaries to lead private sector wages downward, while cutting back social services.'  (quoted from Michael Hudson's blog, EU:  Politics Financialized, Economies Privatized)
Margareta Pagano:  Goldman's role in the Royal Mail sell-off is a red rag to the unions
By Margareta Pagano - The Independent

If Michael Fallon, the business minister, had wanted to smooth things over with the unions, he might have been a little sharper and bypassed Goldman Sachs.

Apparently, Goldman Sachs was chosen because it gave the best presentation at the pitches which is no surprise since its team has been working on this for two years.

Sadly, the reality is that ministers don't have many banks to choose from as the big six investment banks – mainly US ones – have the syndication game sewn up between them.

In any other market, it would be called an oligopoly. Would JP Morgan, Citigroup or Morgan Stanley have gone down any better with the unions? Doubt it. 

Read the article here
Read Michael Hudson's article here


Post a Comment