Mike Morgan v. Goldman Sachs - Complaint and Summons ~ Goldman Sachs Information, Comments, Opinions and Facts

Mike Morgan v. Goldman Sachs - Complaint and Summons

by Mike Morgan | Monday, April 13, 2009 in GS - Lawsuit |

David didn't beat Goliath by waiting till Goliath threw the first punch, so we thought that strategy worked pretty well . . . and we decided to follow it. Today we filed a Complaint in the United States District Court against Goldman Sachs.

You can view the documents:

Complaint - Mike Morgan v. Goldman Sachs - Click Here

Summons - Click Here

And here is the content of an email received from Go Daddy regarding our domain name:

Dear Parties,

Per the legal documents provided, the following domain names have been placed on Registrar-Lock:

GOLDMANSACHS13.COM, GOLDMANSACHS666.COM

The domain names will remain locked during the pending legal proceeding. The lock on the domain names shall expire automatically 1) Upon GoDaddy.com's receipt of an order dismissing or suspending the case 2) Upon the expiration of the domain nameregistration including the Redemption Grace and Pending Delete Periods at the registry.

Thank you,

Shannon McDonald
Domain Services
GoDaddy.com, Inc.

14 comments:

Frank Hope on April 13, 2009 5:30 PM
Excellent pre-emptve strike. I'm very impressed.

Here's another article I wrote for your readers who are interested in learning more about the GS octopus that has its tentacles everywhere titled "Goldman Sachs über alles".

Keep up the great work.
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 5:38 PM
Sweet! I like taking the fight to the evil empire! What about them thar' high-falutin' profits "earned" by GS as announced a little while ago? Wow! Fraud, caprice and just overall bad actin' (to wit: hedged CDS's and back door payments through AIG) sure does pay well!
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 8:23 PM
An investment bank whose main profits are generated from trading debt securities, currency and commodities shall not be allowed to become a bank holding company, eligible to be bailed out at taxpayers' expense. The Fed shall revoke Goldmansachs' bank holding company status. Let goldman sachs trade and take profit or loss at their partners' own risks, not on taxpayers'.
fUny1 on April 13, 2009 9:35 PM
Mike,

Kudos for taking it to Goldman.

we need to band together and show them that the pen is mightier than their sword.

We have to expose these guys since hardly anyone in the media dares to do it.

For a little humorous break from this Goldman showdown check out my take on the Goldman report's missing month of losses known as Dec 2009 at

fUny1.blogspot.com
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 9:40 PM
I watched the Ten Commandments over the easter weekend. Lead the people out of Egypt and into the promise land of truth! Praying for you, this Giant will try anything to shake you. stand fast and trust God! So it is written, So let it be done!
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 9:59 PM
Check out Wikipedia for a list of those associated with GS over the years.
Piker Trader on April 13, 2009 10:10 PM
The little guys are behind you!!!
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 10:38 PM
How many people can pack into a court room ? Let them pursue you. Discovery is a BITCH for the other side. What starts as a attempted silencing of your freedom of speech may turn into a FULL BLOWN INVESTIGATION of GS if enough people get involved. I am tired of lining the pockets of low life scum bags with my tax dollars as I am sure the rest of the world is as well....Charge on my friend !!!
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 10:43 PM
HAHA you're an idiot - go GS!
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 10:58 PM
Your efforts are truly commendable. However, for the purpose of quelling GS's harassment of you and settling the suit, would it not suffice to simply state on your site that "Goldman Sachs" is the registered service mark of Goldman Sachs & Co.?
Anonymous on April 13, 2009 11:17 PM
Goldman's connections to the Obama administration are 'nuff said. Keep up the good work.
Anonymous on April 14, 2009 1:57 AM
GS play book:

1) Get taxpayer's money through AIG as an insurance payment for the toxic assets.
2) Relax mark to market rules to increase the value of the toxic assets.
3) Don't even bring up the fact that after the toxic assets' value is marked up, the difference should be returned to the insurer(taxpayers). Just keep quiet about that fact.
4) Sell the toxic assets at marked up prices through PPIP. But who would buy them?
5) Well, sell the assets to themselves for 7 cents on a dollar. And ensure the transaction through FDIC (taxpayers again!). From now on FDIC does not care about ordinary bank depositors, the public money will be used to protect GS and the likes.
6) Threaten a person who brings all this dirty laundry to the world with POS trademark infringement and similar BS.

This is so clever. I wish I could play by the same rules!
Herbert Barry Woodrose on April 14, 2009 5:48 AM
You have my support. I am well aware of what is going on - I know what is happening to me, and who is doing it. I'll show up with a picket sign to any court proceeding on your behalf.

Fight.
Joan on April 14, 2009 8:37 AM
OMG! You just made my day!

Great move. :-D

Goldman Sachs Information, Comments, Opinions and Facts